Why is this gemstone producing a negative charge? Is this normal? https://balienrockgemstone.runboard.com/t10 Runboard| Why is this gemstone producing a negative charge? Is this normal? en-us Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:06:02 +0000 Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:06:02 +0000 https://www.runboard.com/ rssfeeds_managingeditor@runboard.com (Runboard.com RSS feeds managing editor) rssfeeds_webmaster@runboard.com (Runboard.com RSS feeds webmaster) akBBS 60 Why is this gemstone producing a negative charge? Is this normal?https://balienrockgemstone.runboard.com/p10,from=rss#post10https://balienrockgemstone.runboard.com/p10,from=rss#post10I asked NASA scientist, Albert Juhaz, at John Glenn Research Center in Ohio about the validity of these charged density pulse test results. He requested I send him a copy. He said this testing was unique to the scientist who performed the tests. He said this testing is not commonly used in the scientific community. I asked about the negative charge in the test results. He said he could not comment on these results because this test was not common to the scientific community. That's right, I got a good healthy dose of government gobaly gook. I am not a scientist but I am baffled by these negative micro amps. These negative micro amps do not appear to be normal. CHART ONE: Sequence 0 to sequence 5. micro amps was slightly under 0 or negative. Sequence 5 to sequence 10 the gemstone material was added. Sequence 5 to sequence 10 after the gemstone material was added micro amps dropped from 0 to between -1 and 0. Sequence 10 to sequence 15 there was a surge from -1 micro amps and 0 up to between 2 and 3 micro amps. Then from 2 and 3 micro amps down to 1 and 2 micro amps. Then back up from 1 and 2 micro amps to 2 and 3 micro amps. Then there was a surge down from 2 and 3 micro amps to -1 micro amps and 0. Sequence 15 to sequence 20 there was a drop from 0 and -1 micro amps down to -2 and -1 micro amps. Sequence 20 to sequence 25 there was a jump up from -2 micro amps and -1 micro amps to 0. Sequence 25 to sequence 30. Micro amps started from -1 and -2 micro amps. Then up from -1 and -2 micro amps to 0 and 1 micro amps. CHART TWO: Sequence 0 to sequence 10, micro amps range between 1 and 1.5. Water was stirred at sequence 10. Stirring the water caused the micro amps to briefly surge down from 1 and 1.5 micro amps, to 1 and 0.5 micro amps. Followed by a surge up to 1 and 1.5 micro amps to 1.5 micro amps and 2 micro amps. Stirring the water appears to disrupt some molecular bond. This stirring could have altered chemistry in some strange manner. I am intrigued by this. Sequence 15 the gemstone material was removed leaving only water. After the gemstone material was removed there was a surge down from 1.5 and 2 micro amps to 0. Sequence 15 to sequence 30 micro amps stayed in a range of 0 and 0.5 micro amps. CHART 3: Sequence 0 to sequence 15, micro amps hovered at zero to slightly negative. The gemstone material is added at sequence 15. Sequence 15 there is a surge up from 0 to between 1.5 and 2 micro amps. Followed by a drop from 1.5 and 2 micro amps to 1 micro amps and 1.5 micro amps. Then a jump back up to 1.5 to 2 micro amps. Sequence 20 to sequence 35 there is a surge down from 1.5 and 2 micro amps to -1 and -1.5 micro amps. From there micro amps ranged from -1.5 and -1 micro amps to 0. CHART FOUR: Sequence 0 to sequence 5. Micro amps range between 0 and 0.5. Gemstone material was filtered out of the water at sequence 5. The water was returned to the dish. Sequence 5 to sequence 10, the micro amps ranged from 0 and 0.5 to 0.5 and 1. Sequence 10 to sequence 20 there was a jump up in micro amps from 0.5 micro amps to 1 and 1.5 micro amps then up to 1.5 and 2 micro amps. Sequence 20, fresh water was added to the dish. After fresh water was added, there is a surge down from a high of 1.5 and 2 micro amps to a low of just above 0. Sequence 20 to sequence 30 micro amps was steady slightly above 0. If fresh water was added and there was a positive charge, what is causing this positive charge? Is this normal? I suspect the dish that held the gemstone and water was charged and held the charge.   Dr. Levengood concluded "the gemstone material can alter the free energy characteristics of water, which in terms of major fluctuations is repeatable". This charged density pulse test may explain why ice stops melting at room temperature. If this gemstone has the capability to emit a negative charge, this negative charge may in some way have the capability to cause ice to stop melting at room temperature. Possibly do to its strength or the type of energy it is producing. Perhaps this is what Dr. Levengood meant when he said the gemstone material can alter the free energy characteristic of water? Dr. Levengood refused to elaborate on his results stating "no statement or conjecture can be made regarding the anomalous nature of the gemstone material". These charged density pulse tests could be revealing several hidden characteristics of the beams. If a negative charge does exist within the beams, I think it would be safe to surmise there may be other aggressive elements within these beams.  These charged density pulse tests may explain why insects are killed instantly. Would an extreme negative charge of energy kill insects instantly? Would an extreme negative charge of energy instantly kill a human or cause sever damage to the human body? nondisclosed_email@example.com (COSMICBREEZE72)Fri, 03 Feb 2017 06:40:30 +0000